Historical positionEquityPower Generation
GEV

GEV

GE Vernova

Portfolio weight

Not currently held

This position has been exited. The analysis below is kept as a record of the reasoning at the time and is not maintained as current research. See the Decision Log for the full decision history.

Exited in favor of more focused nuclear exposure

This was never a large position. Constellation was preferred as a more direct way to hold the same view.

GE Vernova sells equipment across several generation technologies, so a view specifically about nuclear economics arrives diluted. Rotating into an operator of existing reactors expressed that view without the rest.

Relative valuation

Forward P/E

Valuation data pending

Direct-peer average

Pending

Versus its own history

Historical forward-P/E series pending. Maintained by hand in data/fundamentals/manual.ts. No free, reliable source exists for consensus estimates, so nothing is inferred here.

Strategic competitors

never averaged

Competing for the same customers or budget, but too different financially for their multiple to say much about this holding.

Constellation Energy logo

CEG

Constellation Energy

51% similar

fwd P/E pending

same business modelsame customer typesame end markets

Excluded from peer average: competes for the same demand, but a different financial profile

TLN

TLN

Talen Energy

48% similar

fwd P/E pending

same business modelsame end marketssimilar growth profile

Excluded from peer average: competes for the same demand, but a different financial profile

NRG

NRG

NRG Energy

48% similar

fwd P/E pending

same business modelsimilar capital intensitysimilar growth profile

Excluded from peer average: competes for the same demand, but a different financial profile

VST

VST

Vistra

47% similar

fwd P/E pending

same business modelsame end marketssimilar growth profile

Excluded from peer average: competes for the same demand, but a different financial profile

Selected by weighted similarity across business model, revenue model, products, end markets, customer type, capital intensity, growth, margins and geography. Direct peers score ≥55% and sit within 2 diversification steps; only they feed the peer average.