OSCR
Oscar Health
A speculative position on growth plus genuine AI use inside insurance operations.
Portfolio weight
2.89%
As of August 20, 2026
Growth and the technology angle
This is a more speculative healthcare position. The appeal is strong growth combined with significant use of AI inside the insurance operation itself, applied to claims handling, utilization review and administrative cost rather than used as a marketing layer.
For a smaller insurer that matters more than it would for an incumbent, because administrative expense is a larger share of the cost base. It is not sufficient on its own: underwriting still has to price medical cost correctly.
Why the position stays small
Oscar's revenue is concentrated in the ACA marketplace, which makes it directly exposed to subsidy policy and to annual risk-pool composition. A single unfavorable enrolment year, or a change to subsidy structure, moves the economics considerably.
Reported earnings are also early and volatile, swinging on reserve development. Policy sensitivity plus thin, unstable margins is why I hold this small and treat it as speculative.
Reported financials
Financial data through Q2 2026
Premiums earned, net
SEC XBRL
Financial data through Q2 2026 · SEC XBRL: PremiumsEarnedNet. Q4 derived as the fiscal-year total less the other three quarters, since XBRL has no standalone Q4 duration.
Revenue growth (YoY)
SEC XBRL
Financial data through Q2 2026 · Year-over-year change, same quarter prior year, from SEC-reported figures.
Operating margin
SEC XBRL
Financial data through Q2 2026 · Computed from SEC-reported operatingIncome ÷ revenue.
Relative valuation
Valuation updated August 2026
Forward P/E
Not applicable. Earnings are early and volatile; the multiple swings on reserve development.
Direct peers
used in the average
Similar enough that comparing multiples is meaningful.
ALHC
Alignment Healthcare
86% similar
fwd P/E pending
CLOV
Clover Health
86% similar
fwd P/E pending
CNC
Centene
82% similar
fwd P/E pending
HUM
Humana
68% similar
fwd P/E pending
CI
The Cigna Group
68% similar
fwd P/E pending
Strategic competitors
never averaged
Competing for the same customers or budget, but too different financially for their multiple to say much about this holding.
UNH
UnitedHealth Group
66% similar
fwd P/E pending
Excluded from peer average: too diversified for a clean multiple comparison
Selected by weighted similarity across business model, revenue model, products, end markets, customer type, capital intensity, growth, margins and geography. Direct peers score ≥55% and sit within 2 diversification steps; only they feed the peer average.

