MA
Mastercard
Deliberate exposure away from AI and compute: a toll on payment volume.
Portfolio weight
5.13%
As of August 20, 2026
Diversification, on purpose
Mastercard gives the portfolio exposure away from the AI and compute theme. That is the primary reason it is here. Most of the book's risk is tied to one capex cycle, and a business whose revenue tracks consumer and commercial payment volume is driven by something largely unrelated.
Network economics and payment volume
The appeal is margins, network economics, and the long-term ability to compound alongside increasing total payment volume. Mastercard takes a small fee on volume crossing its network and carries almost no incremental cost per transaction, which is why operating margin sits where it does.
Cross-border volume carries materially better economics than domestic transactions and is the most cyclical part of the mix, since it moves with travel and global commerce. Switched volume growth is the line that shows whether the network is gaining or losing share of spend.
What the risk actually is
The network itself is genuinely hard to replicate, so competitive displacement isn't the real bear case. The real risk is regulatory pressure on interchange and scheme fees, plus the slow emergence of account-to-account rails that bypass card networks. Neither moves quickly, but both compress the toll rather than the volume. That's why operating margin, not payment volume, is the line to watch.
Reported financials
Financial data through Q2 2026
Net revenue
SEC XBRL
Financial data through Q2 2026 · SEC XBRL: Revenues. Q4 derived as the fiscal-year total less the other three quarters, since XBRL has no standalone Q4 duration.
Revenue growth (YoY)
SEC XBRL
Financial data through Q2 2026 · Year-over-year change, same quarter prior year, from SEC-reported figures.
Operating margin
SEC XBRL
Financial data through Q2 2026 · Computed from SEC-reported operatingIncome ÷ revenue.
Relative valuation
Valuation updated August 2026
Forward P/E
Valuation data pending
Direct-peer average
Pending
Versus its own history
Historical forward-P/E series pending. Maintained by hand in data/fundamentals/manual.ts. No free, reliable source exists for consensus estimates, so nothing is inferred here.
Direct peers
used in the average
Similar enough that comparing multiples is meaningful.
V
Visa
100% similar
fwd P/E pending
AXP
American Express
73% similar
fwd P/E pending
PYPL
PayPal
73% similar
fwd P/E pending
Strategic competitors
never averaged
Competing for the same customers or budget, but too different financially for their multiple to say much about this holding.
MELI
MercadoLibre
34% similar
fwd P/E pending
Excluded from peer average: competes for the same demand, but a different financial profile
Selected by weighted similarity across business model, revenue model, products, end markets, customer type, capital intensity, growth, margins and geography. Direct peers score ≥55% and sit within 2 diversification steps; only they feed the peer average.
