MELI
MercadoLibre
The portfolio's emerging-markets exposure, held as a long-term compounder.
Portfolio weight
5.70%
As of August 20, 2026
Structural growth in Latin America
MercadoLibre is the portfolio's only meaningful exposure outside the United States, and its economics are driven by household formation, credit access and payment adoption in Latin America rather than by enterprise technology budgets. That makes it one of the few holdings whose results do not depend on the AI capital-spending cycle. I considered the valuation reasonable relative to the growth and the quality of the franchise when I built the position.
The business is two reinforcing engines: a commerce marketplace and a payments and credit operation built on top of it. Payments started as a way to make the marketplace work and became a large business in its own right.
Where the risk sits
The credit book is the part that deserves the most attention. Lending into Latin American consumer and small-business segments produces attractive yields precisely because the credit risk is real, and provisioning moves with local conditions. Currency is the second factor. Results are earned locally and reported in dollars, so devaluation can obscure genuine operating progress.
Neither undermines the compounding argument, but both mean reported figures need reading in constant-currency terms to see the business underneath.
Reported financials
Financial data through Q2 2026
Revenue
SEC XBRL
Financial data through Q2 2026 · SEC XBRL: Revenues. Q4 derived as the fiscal-year total less the other three quarters, since XBRL has no standalone Q4 duration.
Revenue growth (YoY)
SEC XBRL
Financial data through Q2 2026 · Year-over-year change, same quarter prior year, from SEC-reported figures.
Gross margin
SEC XBRL
Financial data through Q2 2026 · Computed from SEC-reported grossProfit ÷ revenue.
Operating margin
SEC XBRL
Financial data through Q2 2026 · Computed from SEC-reported operatingIncome ÷ revenue.
Relative valuation
Valuation updated August 2026
Forward P/E
Valuation data pending
Direct-peer average
Pending
Versus its own history
Historical forward-P/E series pending. Maintained by hand in data/fundamentals/manual.ts. No free, reliable source exists for consensus estimates, so nothing is inferred here.
Direct peers
used in the average
Similar enough that comparing multiples is meaningful.
SE
Sea Limited
82% similar
fwd P/E pending
NU
Nu Holdings
76% similar
fwd P/E pending
Strategic competitors
never averaged
Competing for the same customers or budget, but too different financially for their multiple to say much about this holding.
AXP
American Express
43% similar
fwd P/E pending
Excluded from peer average: competes for the same demand, but a different financial profile
PYPL
PayPal
42% similar
fwd P/E pending
Excluded from peer average: competes for the same demand, but a different financial profile
MA
Mastercard
34% similar
fwd P/E pending
Excluded from peer average: competes for the same demand, but a different financial profile
V
Visa
34% similar
fwd P/E pending
Excluded from peer average: competes for the same demand, but a different financial profile
Selected by weighted similarity across business model, revenue model, products, end markets, customer type, capital intensity, growth, margins and geography. Direct peers score ≥55% and sit within 2 diversification steps; only they feed the peer average.
