Historical positionEquityEmerging Markets
Nu Holdings logo

NU

Nu Holdings

Portfolio weight

Not currently held

This position has been exited. The analysis below is kept as a record of the reasoning at the time and is not maintained as current research. See the Decision Log for the full decision history.

Original thesis

Digital banking and consumer fintech exposure in Latin America with a long runway for unit growth.

What changed

The pace of margin expansion and the share-price re-rate combined to make the risk/reward less attractive than other Latin America platform names.

Why the position was exited

Reallocated to higher-conviction holdings.

What it taught

Concentration matters more than diversification within a single regional theme. Capital is better used in one expression than spread thin across overlapping ones.

Relative valuation

Forward P/E

Valuation data pending

Direct-peer average

Pending

Versus its own history

Historical forward-P/E series pending. Maintained by hand in data/fundamentals/manual.ts. No free, reliable source exists for consensus estimates, so nothing is inferred here.

Direct peers

used in the average

Similar enough that comparing multiples is meaningful.

SE

SE

Sea Limited

80% similar

fwd P/E pending

same business modelsame revenue modelsame customer type
MercadoLibre logo

MELI

MercadoLibre

76% similar

fwd P/E pending

same business modelsame revenue modelsame end markets

Strategic competitors

never averaged

Competing for the same customers or budget, but too different financially for their multiple to say much about this holding.

PYPL

PYPL

PayPal

46% similar

fwd P/E pending

same revenue modelsimilar capital intensitysame customer type

Excluded from peer average: competes for the same demand, but a different financial profile

AXP

AXP

American Express

41% similar

fwd P/E pending

same revenue modelsimilar capital intensitysame customer type

Excluded from peer average: competes for the same demand, but a different financial profile

Selected by weighted similarity across business model, revenue model, products, end markets, customer type, capital intensity, growth, margins and geography. Direct peers score ≥55% and sit within 2 diversification steps; only they feed the peer average.