CBRS
Cerebras Systems
A direct, higher-risk expression of the view that agentic AI drives inference demand.
Portfolio weight
1.93%
As of August 20, 2026
The inference thesis
This is a higher-risk direct expression of the agentic-AI thesis. The underlying belief is that widespread deployment of AI agents will materially increase inference demand. Agents run continuously and call models repeatedly, which is a different and larger consumption pattern than occasional human prompting.
Cerebras offers unusually direct exposure to that possibility through an architecture built for fast inference, rather than through a diversified platform where the effect would be diluted. The demand increase is a hypothesis, not an established trend.
Concentration, competition and why this is high-risk
The position is explicitly high-risk. Cerebras competes against NVIDIA, whose software ecosystem is the default for AI workloads, and against hyperscalers designing their own accelerators with guaranteed internal demand. Displacing an entrenched toolchain is much harder than beating it on any single benchmark.
Revenue is also early and concentrated among a small number of customers, so the loss or deferral of one relationship moves reported results substantially. Reported quarters should be read with that fragility in mind rather than extrapolated.
Relative valuation
Valuation updated August 2026
Forward P/E
Not applicable. Not yet profitable.
Direct peers
used in the average
Similar enough that comparing multiples is meaningful.
CRWV
CoreWeave
71% similar
fwd P/E pending
NBIS
Nebius Group
71% similar
fwd P/E pending
IREN
IREN Limited
64% similar
fwd P/E pending
APLD
Applied Digital
63% similar
fwd P/E pending
Strategic competitors
never averaged
Competing for the same customers or budget, but too different financially for their multiple to say much about this holding.
ORCL
Oracle
41% similar
fwd P/E pending
Excluded from peer average: too diversified for a clean multiple comparison
AMZN
Amazon.com
40% similar
fwd P/E pending
Excluded from peer average: too diversified for a clean multiple comparison
NVDA
NVIDIA
37% similar
fwd P/E pending
Excluded from peer average: competes for the same demand, but a different financial profile
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
25% similar
fwd P/E pending
Excluded from peer average: competes for the same demand, but a different financial profile
Selected by weighted similarity across business model, revenue model, products, end markets, customer type, capital intensity, growth, margins and geography. Direct peers score ≥55% and sit within 2 diversification steps; only they feed the peer average.



